Regulators Need to Establish Whether MEV Is Illegal: BIS Report

0
10
Regulators Need to Establish Whether MEV Is Illegal: BIS Report

The Bank for International Settlements has published a new research paper comparing MEV to illegal market manipulation in traditional markets.

Key Takeaways

  • A new Bank for International Settlements research paper has likened MEV to illegal market manipulation in traditional markets.
  • The paper suggests that regulators must establish whether MEV is illegal and whether current insider trading provisions apply to the activity.
  • The bank for central banks also suggested that permissioned blockchains based on trusted intermediaries with publicly known identities may tackle MEV.

The Bank for International Settlements has suggested that new regulatory approaches may be needed to address market manipulation by blockchain miners and validators.

BIS Likens MEV to Illegal Market Manipulation

MEV seems to have become a new subject of interest for global financial institutions.

A new research paper published by staff members of the Bank for International Settlements Thursday has likened maximal extractable value (MEV) in permissionless blockchains to illegal market manipulation, including prohibited activities such as front-running by brokers in traditional markets. To begin combating this alleged manipulation, the paper has suggested that global regulatory bodies must “establish whether value extraction by miners constitutes illegal activity.”

The paper, titled “Miners as intermediaries: extractable value and market manipulation in crypto and DeFi,” explains MEV and its implications for “blockchain-based finance,” and draws regulatory implications for miners and the broader crypto industry. MEV refers to the profits miners or other parties earn by extracting value from blockchain users by leveraging their discretionary power to sequence or reorder transactions within blocks. Typically, MEV affects blockchain users interacting with decentralized, fully on-chain applications such as automated market makers and money markets. By leveraging this power, miners can front-run, back-run, and “sandwich” unsuspecting users’ transactions to extract extra profits by manipulating, for example, the prices of assets on decentralized exchanges. 

Commenting on MEV, the bank for central banks stated in the paper that it represents “illegal front-running by brokers in traditional markets.” It also argued that “MEV is an intrinsic shortcoming of pseudo-anonymous blockchains, and that addressing “this form of market manipulation may call for new regulatory approaches to this new class of intermediaries.” 

Concerning the potential implications of MEV on blockchain-based finance, the bank said there are “several open questions on whether current regulation on insider trading is directly transferable to MEV.” Regardless, regulators should not “uncritically accept” the claims developers and miners make about decentralization to “shield themselves from legal liability,” the paper argued.

In conclusion, the BIS wrote that MEV and related issues may be tackled in permissioned blockchains based on networks of trusted intermediaries whose identities are public. “Here, because the identity of any attacker would be known, it could be held accountable under regulation,” the bank said.

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned ETH and several other cryptocurrencies.

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

What Is MEV? Ethereum’s Invisible Tax Explained

By leveraging their discretionary power to sequence transactions within blocks, miners can extract value from decentralized application users on Ethereum, greatly diminishing the user experience and threatening the stability of…

What Is MEV? Ethereum’s Invisible Tax Explained

Full Decentralisation in DeFi is Illusory: BIS Report

News

In its latest quarterly review, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has claimed that decentralization in decentralized finance (DeFi) is an illusion and argues that policymakers should leverage this to…

Full Decentralisation in DeFi is Illusory: BIS Report

BIS Chief Urges Trust in Central Banks

Agustín Carstens, the general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, has argued that cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance are inherently risky and that “when a crash happens and money is…

BIS Chief Urges Trust in Central Banks

BIS Innovation Hub to Develop DeFi Products in 2022

News

The Bank for International Settlements Innovation Hub is turning its research focus toward developing “DeFi” products, despite the bank’s suspicious stance toward the industry. The BIS to Dabble With DeFi…

BIS Innovation Hub to Develop DeFi Products in 2022

Read More

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here